User talk:Bikepunk: Difference between revisions
(Hey Bikepunk, why did you blank 93.162.99.126's contributions? It's usually a good idea to leave a comment if you're removing stuff that's not obvious spam. I) |
(Hey Bikepunk, why did you blank 93.162.99.126's contributions? It's usually a good idea to leave a comment if you're removing stuff that's not obvious spam. I) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hey Bikepunk, why did you blank [[Special:Contributions/93.162.99.126|93.162.99.126]]'s contributions? It's usually a good idea to leave a comment if you're removing stuff that's not obvious spam. In this case I actually think that it's good starting points for pages like [[Aalborg]] and [[Melbourne]], with some more descriptive text, e.g. <tt>== Anarchist hang-outs ==</tt> :) [[ | Hey Bikepunk, why did you blank [[Special:Contributions/93.162.99.126|93.162.99.126]]'s contributions? It's usually a good idea to leave a comment if you're removing stuff that's not obvious spam. In this case I actually think that it's good starting points for pages like [[Aalborg]] and [[Melbourne]], with some more descriptive text, e.g. <tt>== Anarchist hang-outs ==</tt> :) [[User:Guaka|guaka]] 22:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:10, 16 November 2009
Hey Bikepunk, why did you blank 93.162.99.126's contributions? It's usually a good idea to leave a comment if you're removing stuff that's not obvious spam. In this case I actually think that it's good starting points for pages like Aalborg and Melbourne, with some more descriptive text, e.g. == Anarchist hang-outs == :) guaka 22:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC)